Страница 4 из 6
Добавлено: 25 дек 2005, 16:00
Shadowfox
surprized in the strange way...
Добавлено: 26 дек 2005, 01:19
Borah

in a surprized way

Добавлено: 26 дек 2005, 02:30
Shadowfox
what about Spirit ?

Добавлено: 26 дек 2005, 03:05
The Dishwasher
People, can we please stop spamming? Am I the only person who doesn't like random ICQ like chat in a Lion King forum?
Spirit is a DreamWorks movie, not Disney.
IMHO the transition from CG to hand-drawn animation could have been better made.
Добавлено: 26 дек 2005, 04:39
Shadowfox
They made a transition?
IMNHO, CG has a little bit greater specter than handwriting, which has its own charm as well. As evolution has no pause button and CG provides a surprisingly easy way of rendering virtually perfect physical models, I do not seem to believe that handwriting would any more have the power it once had... That is another point that TLK scores against other animations...
Perfection cannot be perfect itself without having a bit of non-perfection.
Добавлено: 26 дек 2005, 05:47
Borah
hmm... I though it was disney

Добавлено: 26 дек 2005, 16:19
Shadowfox
disney are not the only ones

Добавлено: 27 дек 2005, 01:44
The Dishwasher
Shadowfox: Sorry, let me clarify, I meant that Spirit used both hand drawn and CG techniques, and it was very obviously done when the background was hand made and the horse was CG, or when a hand drawn scene is followed by CG. That is the sort of transition I am talking about. I don't really have anything against CG per se

In TLK the CG antilope beat any Spirit CG effect in terms of style consistency.
However, I don't think that one can compare hand drawn animation and computer animation to handwriting and typing. IMHO. When handwriting/typing, the same information is conveyed, handwriting is more personal, less formally presented. Hand drawn animation produces a different finished result to CG, and the impression one receives from the media will differ more from the animation techniques than from the writing/typing. So IMO the writing/typing analogy is incorrectly used. I think that it is more appropriate when a computer is used in the colouring process rather than in the animation process. Which has been happenning for a while.
Добавлено: 27 дек 2005, 04:01
Shadowfox
A computer not to e used for animation... hah...
Добавлено: 27 дек 2005, 20:48
Douglas
Still don't like it no matter what company made it or if it's coloured with or with a computor.
I mean... IT'S A HORSE!
What could be more boring than a horse... I know! NOTHING!!!!
Добавлено: 30 дек 2005, 02:30
The Dishwasher
Shadowfox: you know what I mean. :P
Douglas: More boring than a horse? Um...Star Wars Episode 1!!! ZZZZ!
I thought it was nice that the horses in Spirit didn't talk. There was more freedom in animation to convey emotion.
Добавлено: 30 дек 2005, 03:55
Borah
Thank you Dishwasher

Star Wars is so out of touch...
Добавлено: 30 дек 2005, 15:58
Douglas
The Dishwasher писал(а):Shadowfox: you know what I mean. :P
Douglas: More boring than a horse? Um...Star Wars Episode 1!!! ZZZZ!
I thought it was nice that the horses in Spirit didn't talk. There was more freedom in animation to convey emotion.
I'd say it's a close tie!
Добавлено: 30 дек 2005, 20:48
Borah
Hm... I wonder what can be so boring about a horse?
Добавлено: 31 дек 2005, 03:32
Douglas
Borah писал(а):Hm... I wonder what can be so boring about a horse?
It's a horse... it eats grass... it's killed and end up being my burger at McDonald's.
That's it... kinda boring don't ya think?